A decade of design, rooted in a disaster.

Queen Pelican began as a response to the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill — a question about what it would take to build a cleaning platform that actually respected the environment it was supposed to protect.

  • UX Research
  • Brand Strategy
  • IA Design
  • Mobile-First
  • Longitudinal Study
  • E-Commerce
Queen Pelican mascot — crowned pelican in yellow apron on green circle
Market Research
65% — Have used cleaning services
35% — Have not

The market existed.
The right option didn't.

65% of survey respondents had already used cleaning services. The demand was there. But no Austin competitor offered transparent ingredients, online booking, or a design built around trust. Queen Pelican was designed to fill that gap.

The data confirmed the demand

8.37 / 10

Average importance rating given to green cleaning by survey respondents

4 in 10

Listed chemical exposure, allergies, and air quality as primary advantages of green products

83%

Gave favorable ratings when asked about green cleaning products and services

What users needed vs. what existed

What users needed

  • Transparent ingredient disclosure
  • Online booking and scheduling
  • Smartphone-accessible experience
  • Customizable service options
  • Trusted green certification

What competitors offered

  • No ingredient transparency
  • No online booking
  • Desktop-only or poor mobile experience
  • Fixed service packages only
  • Vague "eco-friendly" claims

"Many of those surveyed had concerns about their children and pets' exposure to chemicals — yet had no idea what products their cleaning company actually used in their home."

User Personas

Designing for the user who was actually in the room

Research interviews and survey data were synthesized into two primary personas. Both shaped every navigation, design, and content decision that followed.

Dr. Gina Dr. Gina

PhD, Anthropology · Austin, TX

Primary Persona

"I need a cleaning company I can actually trust — one that's as serious about what goes into their products as I am."

Background
  • Millennial · Single · Environmentalist · Super smart nerd
  • PhD in Anthropology, studied Forensic Science at Baylor
  • Works long hours — no time to clean, very particular about what's used in her home
Goals
  • Hire a trustworthy green cleaning company
  • Get home steam cleaned without harsh chemicals
  • Pet-safe products throughout
Frustrations
  • Coming home to an unclean and disorganized space
  • Difficulty finding genuinely green cleaning companies
  • No transparency about what products are used in her home

How she decides: Reads Yelp reviews, shops Amazon, uses Instagram and Twitter. Owns pets — their safety influences every product decision.

Karen Karen

Real Estate Agent · South Austin, TX

Secondary Persona

"I wish cleaning companies were more open about what products they actually use in my home."

Background
  • Baby Boomer · Divorced · 2 kids · Outgoing
  • Left nursing for real estate — 15 years with Remax, now independent
  • Suffers from allergies — chemical exposure affects her at work and at home
Goals
  • Cleaner air at work and at home
  • Replace all filters with HVAC-certified options
  • Hire a female-owned, LEED-certified cleaning company
Frustrations
  • Maintenance never replaces air filters on time
  • Cleaning companies won't disclose what products they use
  • Hard to find LEED-certified services online

How she decides: Trusts friends and colleagues first. Reads product labels. Values Green Business Certified vendors. Uses desktop for research.

Empathy Maps
Dr. Gina
Dr. Gina — The Geeky Green Girl Millennial · Austin, TX
Thinks & Feels
  • Animals are to be protected — no animal testing on products
  • Sustainable ingredients are the way to go
  • Concerned about climate change and glaciers disappearing
  • Artisan vegan soap is the right choice
  • Doesn't want to use soap that harms lakes
  • Candles help shield cat odors
Sees
  • Glaciers disappearing on documentary
  • Basket full of unclean clothes
  • Missing storage space for gadgets
  • Chemical ingredients on product labels
  • Dirty microwave
  • Honey bees in flower beds
Hears
  • Mom complains about the house being messy
  • Lady at Wholefoods recommends a salt scrub
  • Colleagues talking at work
  • Phone ringing — under the clutter
  • Doorbell — FedEx delivery
Says & Does
  • "What's with all the chemicals in products?"
  • Looking for a green cleaning company
  • Using Trader Joe brand for window cleaning
  • Window farming and growing herbs
  • Looking on Instagram for de-clutter ideas
  • Volunteers at garden group
Pain
  • Needs to be better organized
  • Too much time spent at work
  • Doesn't know where to find green cleaning help
  • Chemicals in cleaning products harm the environment
  • Lack of organization around the house
Gain
  • Purchased storage cube bins from Amazon
  • Mom cleaned house while she was at work
  • Found Trader Joe eco-clothing detergent
  • Got a lead from co-worker on eco-cleaning companies
  • Removed carpet — all wood easier for cleanup
Karen
Karen — The Allergy Sufferer Baby Boomer · South Austin, TX
Thinks & Feels
  • Frustrated by allergies — wants to incorporate green living
  • Hopes to hire a new cleaning company soon
  • Green cleaning products are better for allergies
  • Wonders if she needs allergy shots
  • Needs a HEPA filter for her vacuum
  • Wonders if changing diet could improve allergies
Sees
  • Dirty home from new listing — needs urgent cleaning
  • Spaghetti sauce spilled in microwave
  • Dirty air filters with lots of dust
  • Very red, tired eyes
  • Chemical ingredient names on soap labels
  • Business cards of cleaners at coffee shop
Hears
  • "What are you doing about your allergies?"
  • Friend recommending review sites
  • Air conditioner running — needs new filter
  • Loud traffic on the way to work
  • Chester (her dog) barking and spilling food
Says & Does
  • Places Visine in itchy eyes
  • Reads Martha Stewart Magazine
  • Pays extra for eco products
  • Placed artisan soap in car because it smells great
  • Visited a "Good" website after seeing it in a magazine
  • Hopes traffic isn't bad — open house day
Pain
  • Can't find a cleaning company she trusts
  • Unclear air at the workplace — not good for allergies
  • Allergy season is debilitating
  • Chemical smells make her sneeze — like bleach
  • Hand soaps with chemical smell
Gain
  • Found a company that ships eco products monthly
  • Found a green cleaning company that makes its own cleaner
  • Can use app to schedule cleaning services
  • Dish washing detergent without bleach
  • HEPA filters made a big difference with allergies
User Journey Maps

Three journeys mapped across the platform — purchasing soap, getting an estimate, and logging in. Each reflects a distinct user intent identified in the card sort research.

Dr. Gina Karen
Gina & Karen — Purchases Soap Two users, one goal — finding the right product
User Goal

"I want to find and purchase a vegan handmade soap — so I know exactly what I'm putting in my home."

Task Flow
1Arrives at landing — navigates to Products
2Browses Artisan Soap — filters by Vegan category
3Reviews ingredient list — selects product
4Adds to cart — reviews subtotal, no hidden fees
Completes purchase — receives confirmation
Gina and Karen purchase soap — user flow diagram
Karen
Karen — Gets an Estimate Baby Boomer · Real Estate Agent · Allergy Sufferer
User Goal

"I want to get a quote for green cleaning services so I can prepare a listing for open house without worrying about chemical exposure."

Task Flow
1Arrives from colleague referral — selects Get a Quote
2Fills out form — name, address, zip, email
3Selects Residential — answers service questions
4Schedules appointment — date, time, frequency
Completes checkout — receives confirmation
Karen gets an estimate — user flow diagram
Dr. Gina Karen
Gina & Karen — Log In / Sign Up Shared flow — accessing a personalized account experience
User Goal

"I want to log in or create an account so I can access a more personalized experience on Queen Pelican."

Task Flow
1Arrives at landing — selects Log In or Sign Up
2Enters email and password — Success? Enters site
3If new — completes Sign Up, enters contact info
4If forgot password — receives reset email, enters new password
Signs in — redirected to personalized account page
Gina and Karen log in sign up — user flow diagram

"4 out of 10 participants listed allergies, chemical exposure, and air quality as primary reasons for choosing green products. Gina and Karen weren't edge cases — they were the market."

Information Architecture & Card Sort

Letting users define the navigation — not the other way around

A card sort is a research method where participants group content into categories that make sense to them — revealing their mental models rather than assumptions. Before designing a single screen, 30+ cards representing all site content were sorted by real users. Four distinct clusters emerged and restructured the entire IA.

Card Sort Session & Results

Four clear clusters emerged

Participants naturally separated soap products from cleaning products, booking from account management, and purchasing from quoting — distinctions that had not been in the original navigation structure.

Usability session — participant reviewing Queen Pelican paper prototype

Paper prototype usability session — participant navigating the checkout flow.

Key similarity groupings — four natural clusters from the card sort

Participants consistently grouped soap products separately from cleaning products — a distinction the original navigation had ignored entirely.

Key similarity groupings — four natural clusters with participant agreement scores.

Similarity matrix showing agreement scores across all navigation items

Similarity matrix — agreement scores across all 30+ content items.

View raw card sort data →

"Users separated 'Purchase Cleaning Products' from 'Get a Quote' — two actions that look similar on the surface but represent completely different user intents. This single finding directly shaped the dual-path homepage design."

From Assumptions to Architecture

The original sitemap was built on assumptions

The card sort produced a complete reorganization — built directly from user mental models rather than designer assumptions.

Before — Assumption-Based
Original sitemap — scattered navigation with duplicated sections
After — Research-Informed
Revised sitemap — five clear sections from card sort data

Three competitors. Four principles. Two evaluations.

I conducted a heuristic evaluation of Austin's green cleaning market using four of Nielsen's 10 General Principles for Interaction Design: aesthetic and minimalist design, match between system and the real world, recognition rather than recall, and consistency in standards.

Three green cleaning companies were selected based on one criterion: their business model had to focus on green cleaning. Two of the three were re-evaluated a year later. One competitor — The Hive Green Cleaning — was no longer online at the time of the second evaluation. The longevity and web presence of competitors itself became a data point.

Three competitors evaluated: Cleaning Authority, Garcia Green Cleaners, Purple Fig Eco-Cleaning — 2017
2017
Cleaning Authority 2017
2020
Cleaning Authority 2020
2026
Cleaning Authority 2026
Competitor 01 · Re-evaluated

Cleaning Authority

A major regional player with a visible fleet presence in Austin. Evaluated across three iterations spanning nearly a decade — each version a visual refresh, none of them fixing the underlying UX problems. Different flavor, same friction.

Aesthetic & Minimalist Design

Improved — but still content-heavy

The older landing page was cluttered with pop-up ads and animations that blocked content. The redesigned version eliminated the pop-ups and improved visual hierarchy significantly. The 2018 version shows clearer focus — the previous site was more content-driven than user-friendly.

Match Between System & Real World

Unexplained acronyms, no exit path

"MyTCA" appears in the top navigation with no explanation or definition. The login page offers no way back to the main site. "Why Hire Us" was also removed between evaluations without replacement.

Recognition Rather Than Recall

Account benefits never explained

Visitors must arrive with prior knowledge of what "MyTCA" means or assume an account is required. No explanation of account benefits is provided. A growing multi-location company was using a Gmail address for a local office — a credibility gap for a professional service.

Consistency in Standards

Contact page missing key information

The contact page offers only a phone number — no form, no physical address, no email. The most prominent element is a map, but it lacks a service area overlay — the most useful information for a potential customer.

Garcia Green Cleaners website
Competitor 02 · Austin-Based

Garcia Green Cleaners

An Austin-based eco-conscious cleaning company with a good Home Advisor rating and a genuine green commitment. Garcia replaced Hive Green Cleaning in this analysis — Hive's site was taken offline and their web presence did not meet the quality threshold for meaningful comparison.

Note on competitor selection: The original study included Hive Green Cleaning, which has since gone offline entirely. Garcia Green Cleaners — present in the original 2017 competitive overview — better represents the caliber of the Austin green cleaning market.
Aesthetic & Minimalist Design

Clean landing, overcrowded below the fold

The landing page is neat and organized with a clear value proposition: "We only use cleaning products that are safe for people, pets and the planet." However, the 8-page navigation is more than standard. Hero images are generic — a mountain backdrop is a mismatch for a local Austin business.

Match Between System & Real World

Terminology and icon placement create friction

The Facebook icon is positioned above the logo — easy to overlook. The scheduling page asks visitors to "tell us when you would like to have your real estate cleaned" — industry language, not user language.

Recognition Rather Than Recall

Unexpected pages break the user's mental model

  • Facebook icon buried — easily missed
  • Separate "Tip Your Maid" and "Online Store" pages are unexpected navigation items
  • The Online Store page is the owner's unrelated Arbonne makeup business — completely off-brand
  • No integrated scheduling with check-out — booking is disconnected from purchase
Consistency in Standards

Layout, navigation, and button styles all vary

  • Commercial Services and Home Cleaning pages use different layouts
  • Side navigation is bulky and redundant — key pages appear multiple times
  • Completely different button styles appear on different pages — no design system applied
2017
Purple Fig 2017
2026
Purple Fig 2026
Competitor 03 · Re-evaluated

Purple Fig Eco-Cleaning

The most significant transformation of the three competitors. The 2017 evaluation identified real problems — buried navigation, confusing hierarchy, unexplained brand language. By 2026, Purple Fig had rebuilt from the ground up. Clear value proposition, instant quote above the fold, simplified nav, and a credibility strip of industry awards. They fixed exactly what the research flagged.

Aesthetic & Minimalist Design

Beautiful design, poor organization

The landing page has beautiful colors and contrast — layers that work together elegantly. However, the navigation is placed in a non-conventional location. The $500 gift card occupies the most prominent position on the page — raising the question of whether that's truly the company's primary product or simply poor hierarchy.

Match Between System & Real World

#Figlife in navigation — with no explanation

"#Figlife" appears as a navigation item with no explanation. It reads like an insurance company name — users wouldn't know it's a hashtag. Searching "#Figlife" returns two other companies before this one — a discoverability and branding problem.

Recognition Rather Than Recall

Gift card hidden, wording non-standard

There is no gift card link on the landing page — it can only be found buried within Services, #Figlife, and Our Team pages, and not in the same location on each. The purchase page asks users to enter a "Purchase Credit worth ($)" — the expected label is "Amount" or "Gift card value."

Consistency in Standards

Sidebar placement shifts across pages

The sidebar is on the right on Services and #Figlife pages, but switches to the left on Our Team and Gift Card pages. Users must reorient their mental model on every page — a fundamental layout consistency failure.

Nielsen's Principles Applied

Aesthetic & Minimalist Design

Dialogues should not contain irrelevant information. Every extra unit competes with relevant units and diminishes their visibility.

Match Between System & Real World

The system should speak the user's language — familiar words and concepts, not system-oriented terms. Information should appear in natural, logical order.

Recognition Rather Than Recall

Minimize memory load by making objects, actions, and options visible. Users should not have to remember information from one part of the dialogue to another.

Consistency in Standards

Users should not have to wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing. Follow platform and industry conventions.

Design Evolution

These mobile sketches explored three ideas simultaneously. First, an alternative to the hamburger menu — a slide-out side navigation that gave users a different way to move through the app. Second, a soap list page with recommendations at the bottom — three curated suggestions that led to a detail page with more information. Third, that recommendation page doubled as a soft conversion point: a newsletter signup embedded naturally for users who wanted to learn more, without occupying prime screen real estate on the main product page. All three ideas came from one principle — mobile-first means designing for the user's context, not fitting a desktop experience onto a smaller screen.

2018

From Pencil to Pixels

Before any digital tool was opened, the Queen Pelican experience was sketched by hand — every screen, every flow, every interaction. The paper prototype was used in live usability sessions. What participants responded to directly shaped the first hi-fi desktop design.

paper sketch of original queen Pelican landing page

Landing page sketch

sketch of queen pelican site, selecting vegan soap defoliators

Soap selection process sketch

sketch of check out cart for queen pelican

Check out  sketch

Mobile Sketches

Designing for Choice, Not Convention

These mobile sketches explored three ideas simultaneously...

three sketches of mobile devices, herbal soap, then next page after making selection, last sketch is the side menu

Queen Pelican Mobile App Design

These mobile sketches explored three ideas simultaneously. First, an alternative to the hamburger menu — a slide-out side navigation that gave users a different way to move through the app. Second, a soap list page with recommendations at the bottom — three curated suggestions that led to a detail page with more information. Third, that recommendation page doubled as a soft conversion point: a newsletter signup embedded naturally for users who wanted to learn more, without occupying prime screen real estate on the main product page. All three ideas came from one principle — mobile-first means designing for the user’s context, not fitting a desktop experience onto a smaller screen.

2021

The Mobile Pivot

Survey data showed 46% of users completed research on smartphones. The redesign shifted to mobile-first architecture. The yellow iteration restructured the dual-path homepage — separating "Book a Service" from "Purchase Products" as two equal, distinct entry points. The card sort data from 2018 finally showed up in the UI.

Yellow theme — welcome screen, first onboarding screen, 2021

Welcome — onboarding screen 1

Yellow theme — Quality Eco-Cleaning, second onboarding screen, 2021

Quality Eco-Cleaning — onboarding screen 2

Yellow theme — Schedule Today, third onboarding screen, 2021

Schedule Today — onboarding screen 3

Yellow theme — main home page after onboarding, 2021

Main home page — post onboarding

2025

The System Finally Disappears

Onboarding removed entirely. Four clear primary paths from screen one. A decade of research, iteration, and user feedback distilled into a platform that gets out of the user's way. The design doesn't announce itself — it just works.

Queen Pelican final green mobile landing screen — 2025

Landing screen

Queen Pelican soap list page — mobile, 2025

Soap list page

Queen Pelican herbal soap product page — 2025

Herbal soap product page

Queen Pelican soap description page — 2025

Soap description

Queen Pelican final mobile side menu — 2025

Side menu

Queen Pelican scheduling page — mobile, 2025

Scheduling page